TAOCP 7.2.2.2 Exercise 154
Start by restating the implication digraph and the subforest, then fix the level assignment so that every directed edge goes from a higher level to a lower level, as required.
Section 7.2.2.2: Satisfiability
Exercise 154. [20] [20] Suppose we're working above with just four candidate variables ${a, b, c, d}$, and that they're related by three binary clauses $(a \lor b) \land (\bar{a} \lor \bar{c}) \land (c \lor d)$. Find a subforest and a sequence of truth levels to facilitate lookaheads, analogous to (69) and (70).
Verified: yes
Solve time: 3m28s
Start by restating the implication digraph and the subforest, then fix the level assignment so that every directed edge goes from a higher level to a lower level, as required.
Implication digraph
From
$$ (a \lor b)\land(\bar a \lor \bar c)\land(c \lor d) $$
we obtain implications:
$$ \bar a \to b,\quad \bar b \to a,\quad a \to \bar c,\quad c \to \bar a,\quad \bar c \to d,\quad \bar d \to c. $$
1. Spanning subforest
We select the same subforest as before, which is valid since each vertex has at most one outgoing edge and all literals are included:
$$ \bar d \to c \to \bar a \to b, \qquad \bar b \to a \to \bar c \to d. $$
This is a directed spanning forest on the eight literals with two trees rooted at $\bar d$ and $\bar b$. It is acyclic by construction.
2. Correct truth-level assignment
The error in the previous solution was the direction of the level ordering. Since edges must go from higher level to lower level, the roots must be placed at the highest level.
Assign levels as follows:
- Level 3 (roots):
$$ \bar d,\ \bar b $$
- Level 2:
$$ c,\ a $$
- Level 1:
$$ \bar a,\ \bar c $$
- Level 0:
$$ b,\ d $$
Thus the ordering is:
$$ \bar d,\ \bar b;\ c,\ a;\ \bar a,\ \bar c;\ b,\ d. $$
3. Verification of edge direction
Check each edge of the subforest:
- $\bar d(3) \to c(2)$
- $c(2) \to \bar a(1)$
- $\bar a(1) \to b(0)$
- $\bar b(3) \to a(2)$
- $a(2) \to \bar c(1)$
- $\bar c(1) \to d(0)$
Every edge goes from a higher level to a lower level, as required.
Conclusion
The subforest is correct, and with the corrected level assignment it satisfies the required monotonicity condition for lookahead propagation analogous to (70).