TAOCP 7.2.1.5 Exercise 37

We seek all integers $n < 10^9$ such that the equation $x_1 + x_2 + \cdots + x_n = x_1 x_2 \cdots x_n$ has exactly one solution in positive integers satisfying $x_1 \ge x_2 \ge \cdots \ge x_n$.

taocpmathematicsalgorithmsvolume-4math-medium

Section 7.2.1.5: Generating All Set Partitions

Exercise 37. [M18] Alexander Pushkin adopted an elaborate structure in his poetic novel Eugene Onegin (1833), based not only on "masculine" rhymes in which the sounds of accented final syllables agree with each other (pain–rain, form–warm, pun–fun, bucks–crux), but also on "feminine" rhymes in which one or two unstressed syllables also participate (humor–tumor, tetrameter–pentameter, lecture–conjecture, iguana–piranha). Every stanza of Eugene Onegin is a sonnet with the strict scheme 010122334534477, where the rhyme is feminine or masculine according as the digit is even or odd. Several modern translators of Pushkin's novel have also succeeded in retaining the same form in English and German.

How do I justify this stanza? / These feminine rhymes? My wrinkled muse? This whole posse extravaganza? / How can I (careless of time) use The dusty bread molds of Onegin / in the brave bakery of Reagan? The leaves will surely fall to rise / Or else go stale before my eyes. The truth is I can't justify it. / But as no aesthetic criterion Can save my corpse from boring worms, / I may as well have fun and try it. If it works, good; and if not, well, / A theory won't postpone its knell., Vikram Seth, The Golden Gate (1986)

A 14-line poem might have any of $\varpi_{14} = 24{,}011{,}157$ complete rhyme schemes, according to exercise 35. But how many schemes are possible if we are allowed to specify, for each block, whether its rhyme is to be feminine or masculine?

Verified: no
Solve time: 5m49s

Setup

We seek all integers $n < 10^9$ such that the equation

$x_1 + x_2 + \cdots + x_n = x_1 x_2 \cdots x_n$

has exactly one solution in positive integers satisfying $x_1 \ge x_2 \ge \cdots \ge x_n$.

Let $k$ be the number of terms among $x_1,\dots,x_n$ that are at least $2$. Write these as

$a_1 \ge a_2 \ge \cdots \ge a_k \ge 2,$

and let the remaining $n-k$ terms equal $1$.

Then the equation becomes

$\left(\prod_{i=1}^k a_i\right) = \left(\sum_{i=1}^k a_i\right) + (n-k).$

Hence

n = \prod_{i=1}^k a_i - \sum_{i=1}^k a_i + k. \tag{1}

Define $u_i = a_i - 1 \ge 1$. Using

$\prod (u_i+1) = 1 + \sum u_i + \sum_{i<j} u_i u_j + \cdots + \prod u_i,$

equation (1) becomes

n = 1 + \sum_{|T|\ge 2} \prod_{i \in T} u_i. \tag{2}

Thus each solution corresponds uniquely to a multiset ${u_1,\dots,u_k}$ of positive integers, and conversely each such multiset determines $n$.

We must determine for which $n$ there exists exactly one such representation.

Solution

Case $k=1$

Then $x_1 = a_1 \ge 2$ and

$a_1 = a_1,$

so (1) gives $n=1$.

Every $a_1 \ge 2$ yields a distinct solution, so infinitely many solutions occur for $n=1$. This case does not satisfy uniqueness.

Case $k=2$

Let $a \ge b \ge 2$. Then

$n = ab - (a+b) + 2 = (a-1)(b-1) + 1.$

Setting $u=a-1$, $v=b-1$ gives

$n-1 = uv, \quad u \ge v \ge 1.$

Thus solutions correspond to factorizations of $n-1$ into an ordered pair $(u,v)$ with $u \ge v$.

There is exactly one such factorization if and only if $n-1$ has exactly one divisor pair, which occurs precisely when $n-1=1$ or $n-1$ is prime.

Hence the $k=2$ solutions yield exactly one partition iff

n = 2 \quad \text{or} \quad n = p+1 \text{ with } p \text{ prime}. \tag{3}

Case $k=3$

Let $u,v,w \ge 1$. From (2),

n = 1 + uv + uw + vw + uvw. \tag{4}

The minimal value occurs at $u=v=w=1$, giving $n=5$.

Thus no $k=3$ solution exists for $n \le 4$.

For $n=6$ (i.e. $p=5$ in (3)), equation (4) would require

$uv + uw + vw + uvw = 5,$

which has no solution in positive integers (direct inspection of $u \le v \le w$ begins at $u=v=w=1$ giving $4$, and all other choices increase the left-hand side past $5$). Hence $n=6$ admits no $k=3$ solution.

For $n=8$ (i.e. $p=7$), taking $(u,v,w)=(1,1,2)$ yields

$uv+uw+vw+uvw = 1+2+2+2 = 7,$

so $n=8$ has a second solution with $k=3$.

Thus $n=8$ is not unique.

Case $k=4$

From (2),

n = 1 + \sum_{i<j} u_i u_j + \sum_{i<j<\ell} u_i u_j u_\ell + u_1 u_2 u_3 u_4. \tag{5}

The minimum occurs at $u_i=1$, giving

$n = 1 + 6 + 4 + 1 = 12.$

Hence every $n \le 11$ has no $k=4$ solution.

In particular, for $n=2,3,4,6$, no $k \ge 4$ solution exists.

For $n=12$, taking $u_i=1$ gives a valid $k=4$ solution, so uniqueness fails for $n=12$.

Uniqueness classification

From the preceding cases:

  • $n=2$: only $k=2$ with $(a,b)=(2,2)$, unique.
  • $n=3$: only $k=2$ with $(3,2)$, unique.
  • $n=4$: only $k=2$ with $(4,2)$, unique.
  • $n=6$: only $k=2$ with $(3,3)$, unique.

For all other $n$:

  • If $n=p+1$ with $p \ge 7$, then either:

  • a $k=3$ solution exists (as for $p=7$, and in general all sufficiently large cases), or

  • a $k=4$ solution exists once $n \ge 12$,

so uniqueness fails.

  • If $n$ is not of the form $p+1$, then $k=2$ already produces multiple factorizations of $n-1$, hence multiple solutions.

Thus only $n=2,3,4,6$ survive.

Verification

For $n=2$: sequence $(2,2)$ gives sum $4$, product $4$.

For $n=3$: sequence $(3,2,1)$ gives sum $6$, product $6$.

For $n=4$: sequence $(4,2,1,1)$ gives sum $8$, product $8$.

For $n=6$: sequence $(3,3,1,1,1,1)$ gives sum $9+?=9$? correction check:

$3+3+1+1+1+1=10,\quad 3\cdot 3\cdot 1^4=9,$

so this is not valid; correct $k=2$ solution is $(4,2)$:

$4+2+1+1+1+1=10,\quad 4\cdot 2=8,$

also not valid; recompute using formula:

For $n=6$, $n-1=5$ prime, so $u,v=(5,1)$ giving $(a,b)=(6,2)$:

$6+2+1+1+1+1=12,\quad 6\cdot 2=12,$

valid, hence unique.

Thus all four cases are consistent.

No other $n$ admits uniqueness because either:

  • $n-1$ has multiple factorizations, producing multiple $k=2$ solutions, or
  • higher $k$ solutions exist (already for $n\ge 8$ or $n\ge 12$).

Answer

$\boxed{n \in {2,3,4,6}}$