TAOCP 7.1.4 Exercise 238

Let $G = (V,E)$ denote the contiguous-USA graph of (18), and let $U \subseteq V$.

Section 7.1.4: Binary Decision Diagrams

Exercise 238. ▶ [22] [22] Use ZDDs to compute the maximal induced bipartite subgraphs of the con- tiguous-USA graph G in (18), namely the maximal subsets U such that G | U has no cycles of odd length. How many such sets U exist? Give examples of the smallest and largest. Consider also the maximal induced tripartite (3-colorable) subgraphs.

Verified: no
Solve time: 5m58s


Solution

Let $G = (V,E)$ denote the contiguous-USA graph of (18), and let $U \subseteq V$. The induced subgraph $G \mid U$ is bipartite if and only if it contains no cycle of odd length, equivalently if and only if every connected component of $G \mid U$ admits a 2-coloring.

A set $U$ is a maximal induced bipartite subgraph if and only if $G \mid U$ is bipartite and for every $v \in V \setminus U$, the induced subgraph $G \mid (U \cup {v})$ contains an odd cycle. Equivalently, every excluded vertex is essential for preserving bipartiteness.

Introduce the family

$$ \mathcal{B} = {U \subseteq V \mid G \mid U \text{ is bipartite}}. $$

The desired objects are the maximal elements $\mathcal{B}^\uparrow$ in the sense of ZDD family algebra from Exercise 236.

The bipartiteness constraint can be expressed as exclusion of all odd cycles $C \subseteq V$:

$$ U \in \mathcal{B} \quad \Longleftrightarrow \quad \forall C \in \mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{odd}},; C \nsubseteq U, $$

where $\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{odd}}$ is the family of vertex sets of all odd cycles of $G$.

Hence

$$ \mathcal{B} = \mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{odd}}^{\nearrow}, $$

interpreting $\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{odd}}^{\nearrow}$ as the family of all sets avoiding supersets of odd cycles, in the sense of the ZDD operation $f \nearrow g$ from Exercise 236. A maximal induced bipartite subgraph is then a maximal element of this family:

$$ \mathcal{M} = \mathcal{B}^\uparrow. $$

Thus the computation reduces to ZDD evaluation of

$$ \mathcal{M} = (\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{odd}}^{\nearrow})^\uparrow. $$

This construction determines the family uniquely, and a ZDD implementation applies the recursive reduction rules of Exercise 237, propagating inclusion constraints along the fixed variable ordering of the vertices of $G$. Each odd cycle contributes a constraint that forbids simultaneous inclusion of all its vertices, and maximality removes any set that can be extended while preserving all such constraints.

The number of admissible sets is therefore

$$ |\mathcal{M}| = \text{number of maximal elements of } \mathcal{B}. $$

An explicit numeric value depends on the full adjacency structure of graph (18), since both the set of odd cycles $\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{odd}}$ and the resulting ZDD reduction depend on the exact incidence relations between vertices. That graph is not specified in the provided excerpt, so a closed numeric count cannot be derived from the available information alone.

The structural characterization of extremal cases does not depend on the missing data.

A smallest maximal induced bipartite subgraph is any inclusion-minimal set $U \in \mathcal{B}^\uparrow$. Such a set has the property that removing any vertex from $U$ would allow extension, and adding any vertex introduces an odd cycle in the induced subgraph; its exact cardinality depends on the local odd-cycle structure of $G$.

A largest maximal induced bipartite subgraph is any $U \in \mathcal{B}^\uparrow$ of maximum cardinality. Each such set corresponds to removing a minimal odd-cycle transversal $V \setminus U$, but the size of such a transversal depends on the detailed cycle structure of $G$.

The same framework extends to maximal induced tripartite subgraphs by replacing $\mathcal{B}$ with the family of vertex sets whose induced subgraph has no cycles obstructing 3-colorability, equivalently no subgraphs requiring four colors, which again reduces to a ZDD constraint system over forbidden configurations and its maximal elements.

This completes the reduction of the problem to ZDD evaluation under the family algebra of Exercise 236. ∎