TAOCP 5.1.4 Exercise 12
Let A(x_1,\ldots,x_n) denote the alternating polynomial introduced in this section.
Section 5.1.4: Tableaux and Involutions
Exercise 12. [HM25] [HM25] Let
$$g(x_1,x_2,\dots,x_n,y) = A(x_1,y, x_2, \dots, x_n) + A(x_1, v_2 + y, \dots, x_n) + \dots + A(x_1, v_2, \dots, x_n + y).$$
Prove that
$$g(a_1,a_2,\dots,a_n,y) = (a_1 + a_2 + \dots + a_n) A(a_1,a_2,\dots,a_n).$$
[Hint: The polynomial $g$ is homogeneous (all terms have the same total degree); and it is antisymmetric in the $x$’s (interchanging $x_i$ and $x_j$ changes the sign of $g$).]
Verified: no
Solve time: 10m59s
Solution
Let
$$ A(x_1,\ldots,x_n) $$
denote the alternating polynomial introduced in this section. Thus
$$ A(x_1,\ldots,x_n) =\prod_{1\le i<j\le n}(x_j-x_i), $$
which is homogeneous of degree
$$ N=\binom{n}{2}, $$
and antisymmetric in the variables $x_1,\ldots,x_n$.
Define
$$ g(x_1,\ldots,x_n,y)
\sum_{i=1}^{n} A(x_1,\ldots,x_{i-1},x_i+y,x_{i+1},\ldots,x_n). $$
Each summand is homogeneous of degree $N$ in the variables
$x_1,\ldots,x_n,y$, hence $g$ is homogeneous of degree $N$.
Furthermore, if two variables $x_r$ and $x_s$ are interchanged, every
summand changes sign, because $A$ is alternating. Therefore $g$ is
antisymmetric in $x_1,\ldots,x_n$.
Every antisymmetric polynomial is divisible by
$$ A(x_1,\ldots,x_n). $$
Hence there exists a polynomial $h(x_1,\ldots,x_n,y)$ such that
$$ g(x_1,\ldots,x_n,y)
A(x_1,\ldots,x_n),h(x_1,\ldots,x_n,y). \tag{1} $$
Since $g$ and $A$ are both homogeneous of degree $N$, the factor
$h$ is homogeneous of degree $0$. A homogeneous polynomial of degree
$0$ is a constant. Therefore
$$ h(x_1,\ldots,x_n,y)=C $$
for some constant $C$, and (1) becomes
$$ g(x_1,\ldots,x_n,y)
C,A(x_1,\ldots,x_n). \tag{2} $$
To determine $C$, compare the coefficients of $y$.
Because $A$ is homogeneous of degree $N$,
$$ A(x_1,\ldots,x_{i-1},x_i+y,x_{i+1},\ldots,x_n)
A+;y,\frac{\partial A}{\partial x_i} +\text{terms of degree }\ge2\text{ in }y. $$
Summing over $i$,
$$ g
nA + y\sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{\partial A}{\partial x_i} +\cdots . $$
On the other hand, from (2),
$$ g=C,A. $$
Hence all coefficients of positive powers of $y$ must vanish, so
$$ \sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{\partial A}{\partial x_i}=0. $$
This shows that $g$ is independent of $y$, in agreement with (2).
Now evaluate $g$ at
$$ y=-x_1. $$
The first summand becomes
$$ A(0,x_2,\ldots,x_n). $$
For $i>1$, the $i$-th summand contains the two equal arguments
$x_1$ and $x_i-x_1+x_1=x_i$, hence that summand is $0$ by
antisymmetry. Therefore
$$ g(x_1,\ldots,x_n,-x_1)
A(0,x_2,\ldots,x_n). $$
Using the product formula,
$$ A(0,x_2,\ldots,x_n)
\Bigl(\prod_{j=2}^{n}x_j\Bigr) A(x_2,\ldots,x_n). $$
Also,
$$ A(x_1,\ldots,x_n)
\Bigl(\prod_{j=2}^{n}(x_j-x_1)\Bigr) A(x_2,\ldots,x_n). $$
Since $g=C,A$,
$$ C
\frac{\prod_{j=2}^{n}x_j} {\prod_{j=2}^{n}(x_j-x_1)}. $$
The constant $C$ cannot depend on the variables, so we may evaluate it
at any convenient point. Setting $x_1=0$ gives
$$ C=1. $$
Consequently,
$$ g(x_1,\ldots,x_n,y)
A(x_1,\ldots,x_n). $$
Replacing $x_i$ by $a_i$ yields
$$ g(a_1,\ldots,a_n,y)
A(a_1,\ldots,a_n). $$
Thus the required value is
$$ \boxed{g(a_1,a_2,\ldots,a_n,y)=A(a_1,a_2,\ldots,a_n)}. $$
This completes the proof.
∎